Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: | 502 commits in llvm | 3de11e9251bb [mlir][CF] Add `ub.unreachable` canonicalization (#169873) | a8cffb82991f Remove unused MCObjectFileInfo::SupportsWeakOmittedEHFrame | 24b87b8d4891 [VPlan] Skip cost verification for loops with EVL gather/scatter. | 9ffd2e40c1c4 [SimplifyCFG] Fix `SimplifyCFG` pass to skip folding when both blocks contain convergence loop/entry intrinsics. (#166452) | cd3192a2c9c4 [VPlan] Turn IVOp assertion into early exit. | ... and 497 more commits in llvm Produces 14 regressions 1 fix: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C++/0035 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C++/0035/Fujitsu-C++-0035_0013.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0356 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0356/Fujitsu-Fortran-0356_0117.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0363 ... | ... and 15 more | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one | | fixes.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0734 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0734/Fujitsu-Fortran-0734_0001.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/2648/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/2648/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/2648/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/2648/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/2647/artifact/artifacts