diff --git a/notify/configure-toolchain.txt b/notify/configure-toolchain.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..cb8f0f40 --- /dev/null +++ b/notify/configure-toolchain.txt @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ + +Most relevant configure and test flags: --target arm-linux-gnueabihf + +Full configure and make flags for each step: + diff --git a/notify/fixes.sum b/notify/fixes.sum new file mode 100644 index 00000000..290f7d22 --- /dev/null +++ b/notify/fixes.sum @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ + === gcc tests === + +Running gcc:gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp ... +UNRESOLVED: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr52634_0.c: can't read "name": no such variable for " dg-require-weak 1 "" " + + === Results Summary === + +# of stable fails 576 +# of flaky entries 0 +# of all tests 523470 diff --git a/notify/jira/comment-template.txt b/notify/jira/comment-template.txt index 811cad60..8db49295 100644 --- a/notify/jira/comment-template.txt +++ b/notify/jira/comment-template.txt @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ [GNU-692] -FAIL: 2 regressions: 1 progressions +2 regressions 1 fix Details: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts/notify/mail-body.txt/*view*/ diff --git a/notify/jira/description b/notify/jira/description index cadac60b..9d6c29af 100644 --- a/notify/jira/description +++ b/notify/jira/description @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Commit: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e -commit gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495 +commit gcc-14-159-g03cebd304955 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 @@ -8,9 +8,7 @@ Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 In the comments for PR108099 Jakub provided some testcases that demonstrated that even before the regression noted in the patch we were getting the semantics of this extension wrong: in the unsigned case we weren't producing - the corresponding standard unsigned type but another distinct one of the - same size, and in the signed case we were just dropping it on the floor and -... 26 lines of the commit log omitted. +... 28 lines of the commit log omitted. * tcwg_gcc_check ** master-aarch64 @@ -174,8 +172,8 @@ Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-aarch64/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/90/artifact/artifacts ** master-arm -*** FAIL: 2 regressions: 1 progressions -*** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-arm/details.txt +*** 2 regressions 1 fix +*** https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts * tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc ** master-aarch64 @@ -187,4 +185,4 @@ Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc/master-arm/details.txt *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/76/ -Latest data: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/jira/yaml +Latest data: https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/jira/yaml diff --git a/notify/jira/summary b/notify/jira/summary index e97f272b..13400724 100644 --- a/notify/jira/summary +++ b/notify/jira/summary @@ -1 +1 @@ -gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495: FAIL: 1 regressions +gcc-14-159-g03cebd304955: FAIL: 1 regressions diff --git a/notify/lnt_report.json b/notify/lnt_report.json index 0f23404d..ffcdc499 100644 --- a/notify/lnt_report.json +++ b/notify/lnt_report.json @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Info": { "tag": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc", "test_url": "https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/", - "run_order": "0095 (basepoints/gcc-14-00159-g03cebd30495)", + "run_order": "0095 (basepoints/gcc-14-00159-g03cebd304955)", "git_binutils": "https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=a88ee931eee4ba7339c481735b9405f66161e2f6 (unchanged)", "git_gcc": "https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e (+ 1 commits)", "git_linux": "https://git.linaro.org/kernel-org/linux.git/commit/?id=8e41e0a575664d26bb87e012c39435c4c3914ed9 (unchanged)", @@ -45,18 +45,18 @@ , { "Data": [ - 6 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.FAIL.nb_FAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.FAIL.nb_FAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 3 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" } , { @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" } , { @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.ERROR.nb_ERROR" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.ERROR.nb_ERROR" } , { @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.XPASS.nb_XPASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.XPASS.nb_XPASS" } , { @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.OTHER.nb_OTHER" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.OTHER.nb_OTHER" } , { @@ -96,55 +96,55 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 251 + 3 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 66225 + 44 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.PASS.nb_PASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.PASS.nb_PASS" } , { "Data": [ - 526 + 1 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" } , { "Data": [ - 67002 + 48 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.good.nb_good" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.good.nb_good" } , { "Data": [ - 9 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.bad.nb_bad" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.bad.nb_bad" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 15 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.FAIL.nb_FAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.FAIL.nb_FAIL" } , { @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" } , { @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" } , { @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.ERROR.nb_ERROR" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.ERROR.nb_ERROR" } , { @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.XPASS.nb_XPASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.XPASS.nb_XPASS" } , { @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.OTHER.nb_OTHER" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.OTHER.nb_OTHER" } , { @@ -192,63 +192,63 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 284 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 44 + 15016 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.PASS.nb_PASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.PASS.nb_PASS" } , { "Data": [ - 5 + 676 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" } , { "Data": [ - 49 + 15976 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.good.nb_good" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.good.nb_good" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 15 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.bad.nb_bad" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.bad.nb_bad" } , { "Data": [ - 103 + 5 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.FAIL.nb_FAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.FAIL.nb_FAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 143 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" } , { @@ -256,15 +256,15 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" } , { "Data": [ - 1 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.ERROR.nb_ERROR" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.ERROR.nb_ERROR" } , { @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.XPASS.nb_XPASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.XPASS.nb_XPASS" } , { @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.OTHER.nb_OTHER" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.OTHER.nb_OTHER" } , { @@ -288,63 +288,63 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 1193 + 106 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 167768 + 14725 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.PASS.nb_PASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.PASS.nb_PASS" } , { "Data": [ - 7831 + 753 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" } , { "Data": [ - 176792 + 15584 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.good.nb_good" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.good.nb_good" } , { "Data": [ - 247 + 5 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.bad.nb_bad" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.bad.nb_bad" } , { "Data": [ - 15 + 212 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.FAIL.nb_FAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.FAIL.nb_FAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 174 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" } , { @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" } , { @@ -360,15 +360,15 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.ERROR.nb_ERROR" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.ERROR.nb_ERROR" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 2 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.XPASS.nb_XPASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.XPASS.nb_XPASS" } , { @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.OTHER.nb_OTHER" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.OTHER.nb_OTHER" } , { @@ -384,63 +384,63 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 284 + 2070 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 15016 + 234193 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.PASS.nb_PASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.PASS.nb_PASS" } , { "Data": [ - 676 + 11092 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" } , { "Data": [ - 15976 + 247355 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.good.nb_good" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.good.nb_good" } , { "Data": [ - 15 + 388 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libgomp.bad.nb_bad" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.bad.nb_bad" } , { "Data": [ - 212 + 103 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.FAIL.nb_FAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.FAIL.nb_FAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 174 + 143 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" } , { @@ -448,23 +448,23 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 1 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.ERROR.nb_ERROR" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.ERROR.nb_ERROR" } , { "Data": [ - 2 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.XPASS.nb_XPASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.XPASS.nb_XPASS" } , { @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.OTHER.nb_OTHER" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.OTHER.nb_OTHER" } , { @@ -480,63 +480,63 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 2070 + 1193 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 234193 + 167768 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.PASS.nb_PASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.PASS.nb_PASS" } , { "Data": [ - 11092 + 7831 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" } , { "Data": [ - 247355 + 176792 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.good.nb_good" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.good.nb_good" } , { "Data": [ - 388 + 247 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.g++.bad.nb_bad" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gcc.bad.nb_bad" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 6 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.FAIL.nb_FAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.FAIL.nb_FAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 3 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" } , { @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" } , { @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.ERROR.nb_ERROR" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.ERROR.nb_ERROR" } , { @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.XPASS.nb_XPASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.XPASS.nb_XPASS" } , { @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.OTHER.nb_OTHER" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.OTHER.nb_OTHER" } , { @@ -576,55 +576,55 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 3 + 251 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 44 + 66225 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.PASS.nb_PASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.PASS.nb_PASS" } , { "Data": [ - 1 + 526 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" } , { "Data": [ - 48 + 67002 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.good.nb_good" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.good.nb_good" } , { "Data": [ - 0 + 9 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libitm.bad.nb_bad" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.gfortran.bad.nb_bad" } , { "Data": [ - 5 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.FAIL.nb_FAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.FAIL.nb_FAIL" } , { @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.UNRESOLVED.nb_UNRESOLVED" } , { @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.UNTESTED.nb_UNTESTED" } , { @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.ERROR.nb_ERROR" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.ERROR.nb_ERROR" } , { @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.XPASS.nb_XPASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.XPASS.nb_XPASS" } , { @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.OTHER.nb_OTHER" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.OTHER.nb_OTHER" } , { @@ -672,47 +672,47 @@ 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.KFAIL.nb_KFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 106 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.XFAIL.nb_XFAIL" } , { "Data": [ - 14725 + 44 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.PASS.nb_PASS" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.PASS.nb_PASS" } , { "Data": [ - 753 + 5 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.UNSUPPORTED.nb_UNSUPPORTED" } , { "Data": [ - 15584 + 49 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.good.nb_good" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.good.nb_good" } , { "Data": [ - 5 + 0 ], "Info": {}, - "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libstdc++.bad.nb_bad" + "Name": "tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc.libatomic.bad.nb_bad" } , { diff --git a/notify/mail-body.txt b/notify/mail-body.txt index 47f44658..f33b9213 100644 --- a/notify/mail-body.txt +++ b/notify/mail-body.txt @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@ -Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. +Dear contributor, -We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. +Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. -We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-692 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. - -In master-arm after: - - | commit gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495 +In master-arm, after: + | commit gcc-14-159-g03cebd304955 | Author: Jason Merrill | Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 | @@ -15,223 +12,43 @@ In master-arm after: | In the comments for PR108099 Jakub provided some testcases that demonstrated | that even before the regression noted in the patch we were getting the | semantics of this extension wrong: in the unsigned case we weren't producing - | the corresponding standard unsigned type but another distinct one of the - | same size, and in the signed case we were just dropping it on the floor and - | ... 26 lines of the commit log omitted. - -FAIL: 2 regressions: 1 progressions + | ... 28 lines of the commit log omitted. -regressions.sum: - === gcc tests === - -Running gcc:gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp ... -UNRESOLVED: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr52634_0.c: can't read "name": no such variable for " dg-require-weak 1 "" " - === libstdc++ tests === +Produces 2 regressions 1 fix: + | + | regressions.sum: + | Running gcc:gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp ... + | UNRESOLVED: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr52634_0.c: can't read "name": no such variable for " dg-require-weak 1 "" " + | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... + | FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test + | + | fixes.sum: + | Running gcc:gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp ... + | UNRESOLVED: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr52634_0.c: can't read "name": no such variable for " dg-require-weak 1 "" " -Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... -FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test +Used configuration : + *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc master-arm + *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf +We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-692. Please let us know if you have a fix. -progressions.sum: - === gcc tests === +If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list. -Running gcc:gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp ... -UNRESOLVED: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr52634_0.c: can't read "name": no such variable for " dg-require-weak 1 "" " +-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- +The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: -You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ -The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in - - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts/notify/ +You can find the failure logs in + * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts/ +The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in + * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts/notify/ The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail - -The configuration of this build is: -CI config tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc master-arm - ------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- -The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: + * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/93/artifact/artifacts -Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt +Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e -List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : -* tcwg_gcc_check -** master-aarch64 -*** FAIL: 1 regressions -*** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/details.txt -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/161/artifact/artifacts -** master-arm -*** FAIL: 1 regressions -*** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/164/ -* tcwg_gcc_check_bootstrap -*Status of basepoints/gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495 commit for tcwg_gcc_check_bootstrap: -*commit 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e -*Author: Jason Merrill -*Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 -* -* c++: fix 'unsigned typedef-name' extension [PR108099] -* -* In the comments for PR108099 Jakub provided some testcases that demonstrated -* that even before the regression noted in the patch we were getting the -* semantics of this extension wrong: in the unsigned case we weren't producing -* the corresponding standard unsigned type but another distinct one of the -* same size, and in the signed case we were just dropping it on the floor and -* not actually returning a signed type at all. -* -* The former issue is fixed by using c_common_signed_or_unsigned_type instead -* of unsigned_type_for, and the latter issue by adding a (signed_p && -* typedef_decl) case. -* -* This patch introduces a failure on std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc due to -* the latter issue, since the testcase expects 'signed rep_t' to do something -* sensible, and previously we didn't. Now that we do, it exposes a bug in the -* __max_diff_type::operator>>= handling of sign extension: when we evaluate -* -1000 >> 2 in __max_diff_type we keep the MSB set, but leave the -* second-most-significant bit cleared. -* -* PR c++/108099 -* -* gcc/cp/ChangeLog: -* -* * decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Don't clear typedef_decl after 'unsigned -* typedef' pedwarn. Use c_common_signed_or_unsigned_type. Also -* handle 'signed typedef'. -* -* gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: -* -* * g++.dg/ext/int128-8.C: Remove xfailed dg-bogus markers. -* * g++.dg/ext/unsigned-typedef2.C: New test. -* * g++.dg/ext/unsigned-typedef3.C: New test. -** master-aarch64-check_bootstrap -*** [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495 -*** commit 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e -*** Author: Jason Merrill -*** -*** c++: fix 'unsigned typedef-name' extension [PR108099] -*** -*** Obtained the following regression: -*** | # Manifest: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail -*** | # Getting actual results from build directory /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/gcc.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/libgomp.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/libitm.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/gfortran.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/libstdc++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/g++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/artifacts/sumfiles/libatomic.sum -*** | # -*** | # -*** | # Unexpected results in this build (new failures) -*** | # === libstdc++ tests === -*** | # -*** | # Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... -*** | # FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test -*** | # -*** | # === Results Summary === -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check_bootstrap--master-aarch64-check_bootstrap-build/71/ -** master-aarch64-check_bootstrap_lto -*** [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495 -*** commit 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e -*** Author: Jason Merrill -*** -*** c++: fix 'unsigned typedef-name' extension [PR108099] -*** -*** Obtained the following regression: -*** | # Manifest: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail -*** | # Getting actual results from build directory /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/gcc.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/libgomp.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/libitm.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/gfortran.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/libstdc++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/g++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/artifacts/sumfiles/libatomic.sum -*** | # -*** | # -*** | # Unexpected results in this build (new failures) -*** | # === libstdc++ tests === -*** | # -*** | # Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... -*** | # FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test -*** | # -*** | # === Results Summary === -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check_bootstrap--master-aarch64-check_bootstrap_lto-build/71/ -** master-arm-check_bootstrap -*** [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495 -*** commit 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e -*** Author: Jason Merrill -*** -*** c++: fix 'unsigned typedef-name' extension [PR108099] -*** -*** Obtained the following regression: -*** | # Manifest: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail -*** | # Getting actual results from build directory /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/gcc.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libgomp.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libitm.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/gfortran.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libstdc++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/g++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libatomic.sum -*** | # -*** | # -*** | # Unexpected results in this build (new failures) -*** | # === libstdc++ tests === -*** | # -*** | # Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... -*** | # FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test -*** | # -*** | # === Results Summary === -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check_bootstrap--master-arm-check_bootstrap-build/73/ -** master-arm-check_bootstrap_lto -*** [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495 -*** commit 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e -*** Author: Jason Merrill -*** -*** c++: fix 'unsigned typedef-name' extension [PR108099] -*** -*** Obtained the following regression: -*** | # Manifest: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail -*** | # Getting actual results from build directory /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libstdc++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/gfortran.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libitm.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libgomp.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/libatomic.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/g++.sum -*** | # /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_6/artifacts/sumfiles/gcc.sum -*** | # -*** | # -*** | # Unexpected results in this build (new failures) -*** | # === libstdc++ tests === -*** | # -*** | # Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... -*** | # FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test -*** | # -*** | # === Results Summary === -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check_bootstrap--master-arm-check_bootstrap_lto-build/75/ -* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc -** master-aarch64 -*** FAIL: 1 regressions -*** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-aarch64/details.txt -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/90/artifact/artifacts -** master-arm -*** FAIL: 2 regressions: 1 progressions -*** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-arm/details.txt -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/95/artifact/artifacts -* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc -** master-aarch64 -*** FAIL: 1 regressions -*** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc/master-aarch64/details.txt -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/72/artifact/artifacts -** master-arm -*** FAIL: 1 regressions -*** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc/master-arm/details.txt -*** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/76/ - diff --git a/notify/mail-subject.txt b/notify/mail-subject.txt index 3c171403..a8a38c45 100644 --- a/notify/mail-subject.txt +++ b/notify/mail-subject.txt @@ -1 +1 @@ -[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-159-g03cebd30495: FAIL: 2 regressions: 1 progressions on arm +[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-159-g03cebd304955: 2 regressions 1 fix on arm diff --git a/notify/results.compare.txt b/notify/results.compare.txt index e3bd682a..f25267c1 100644 --- a/notify/results.compare.txt +++ b/notify/results.compare.txt @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ libgomp.sum libitm.sum libstdc++.sum Comparing: -REFERENCE:/tmp/gxx-sum1.24469 -CURRENT: /tmp/gxx-sum2.24469 +REFERENCE:/tmp/gxx-sum1.31112 +CURRENT: /tmp/gxx-sum2.31112 +---------+---------+ o RUN STATUS: | REF | RES |